CONTROL OF VOLUNTARY CORN WITH DOSES OF POST-EMERGENT GRAMINICIDES APPLIED AT DIFFERENT PHENOLOGICAL STAGES
Keywords:
ACCase; clethodim; quizalofop; Zea mays; weed control.Abstract
The occurrence of voluntary corn has been common in Brazilian crops, due to the adoption of a succession of soybean and corn crops resistant to glyphosate. The aim of this work was to evaluate the control of voluntary corn using different doses of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) inhibitors herbicides at different phenological stages. The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse, in a completely randomized design. The treatments were organized in a factorial scheme (3x7x2), with three herbicides (clethodim, quizalofop and clethodim + quizalofop), applied in seven doses [0; 25; 50; 100; 200; 400 and 800 mL of commercial product (C.P.) ha-1], at two phenological stages (V3 and V6). Visual control assessments were carried out at 14, 21 and 28 days after application of treatments (DAT) and shoot dry mass (SDM) at 28 DAT. The data were submitted to analysis of variance and to complementary analysis by regression adjustment. For all herbicides, the control of voluntary RR corn was greater at V3 stage, requiring lower doses compared to V6. The total control of voluntary corn plants at V3 was obtained with doses of 25 mL C.P. ha-1 for all herbicides evaluated. For V6 application, 400 mL C.P. ha-1 of clethodim and 100 mL C.P. ha-1 of quizalofop and clethodim + quizalofop were necessary to achieve 100% control. Thus, clethodim was more sensitive to advancing corn growth, compared to others herbicides, requiring higher doses to achieve complete control of volunteer corn.
Downloads
References
BLAKER, T. W.; GREYSON, R. I. Developmental variation of leaf surface wax of maize, Zea mays. Canadian Journal of Botany, v.66, n.5, p.839-846, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1139/b88-122
BRASIL. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. AGROFIT - Consulta de ingrediente ativo. Disponível em: <http://agrofit.agricultura.gov.br/agrofit_cons/principal_agrofit_cons>. Acesso em: 31 abr. 2020.
BURTON, J. D.; GRONWALD, J. W.; SOMERS, D. A.; GENGEBACH, B. G.; WYSE, D. L. Inhibition of corn acetyl-CoA carboxylase by cyclohexanedione and aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, v.34, n.1, p.76-85, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-3575(89)90143-0
CARVALHO, S. J. P.; NICOLAI, M.; FERREIRA, R. R.; FIGUEIRA, A. V. O.; CHRISTOFFOLETI, P. J. Herbicide selectivity by differential metabolism: considerations for reducing crop damages. Scientia Agricola, v.66, n.1, p.136-142, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162009000100020
CARVALHO, S. J. P.; UZUELE, E. L.; SOARES, D. J.; LÓPEZ‑OVEJERO, R. F.; CHRISTOFFOLETI, P. J. Control of glyphosate-resistant volunteer maize using ACCase inhibiting herbicides. Revista Caatinga, v.32, n.3, p.575-580, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252019v32n301rc
CHAHAL, P. S.; JHALA, A. J. Herbicide programs for control of glyphosate-resistant volunteer corn in glufosinate-resistant soybean. Weed Technology, v.29, n.3, p.431-443, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-15-00001.1
COBB, A. H.; READE, J. P. H. Herbicides and Plant Physiology. 2. ed. Newport: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. 286 p.
COSTA, N. V.; ZOBIOLE, L. H. S.; SCARIOT, C. A.; PEREIRA, G. R.; MORATELLI, G. Glyphosate tolerant volunteer corn control at two development stages. Planta Daninha, v.32, n.4, p.675-682, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582014000400002
LANCASTER, Z. D.; NORSWORTHY, J. K.; SCOTT, R. C. Residual activity of ACCase-inhibiting herbicides on monocot crops and weeds. Weed Technology, v.32, n.4, p.364-370, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.13
LIU, W.; HARRISON, D. K.; CHALUPSKA, D.; GORNICKI, P.; O’DONNELL, C.C.; ADKINS, S. W.; HASELKORN, R.; WILLIAMS, R. R. Single-site mutations in the carboxyltransferase domain of plastid acetyl-CoA carboxylase confer resistance to grass-specific herbicides. Proceedings of the National Academy, v.104, n.9, p.3627-3632, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611572104
LÓPEZ‑OVEJERO, R. F.; SOARES, D. J.; OLIVEIRA, N. C.; KAWAGUCHI, I. T.; BERGER, G. U.; CARVALHO, S. J. P.; CHRISTOFFOLETI, P. J. Interferência e controle de milho voluntário tolerante ao glifosato na cultura da soja. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v.51, n.4, p.340-347, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2016000400006
MACIEL, C. D. G; ZOBIOLE. L. H. S.; SOUZA, J. I.; HIROOKA, E.; LUCAS GEANINY NORO VARGAS DE LIMA, L. G. N. V.; SOARES, C. R. B.; PIVATTO, R. A. D.; FUCHS, G. M.; HELVIG, E. O. Eficácia do herbicida haloxyfop R (GR-142) isolado e associado ao 2,4-D no controle de híbridos de milho RR® voluntário. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, v.12, n.2, p.112-123, 2013. https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v12i2.244
MARCA, V.; PROCÓPIO, S. O.; SILVA, A. G.; VOLF, M. Controle químico de milho voluntário resistente ao herbicida glyphosate. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, v.14, n.2, p.103-110, 2015. https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v14i2.408
MARQUARDT, P. T.; JOHNSON, W. G. Influence of clethodim application timing on control of volunteer maize in soybean. Weed Technology, v.27, n.4, p.645-648, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-12-00188.1
MOTEL, A.; GÜNTHER, S.; CLAUSS, M.; KOBEK, K.; FOCKE, M.; LICHTENTHALER, H. K. Studies on the inhibition of biotin-containing carboxylases by acetyl-coa carboxylase inhibitors. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C, v.48, n.3-4, p.294-300, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1993-3-429
NANDULA, V. K. Herbicide resistance traits in maize and soybean: current status and future outlook. Plants, v.8, n.9, p.337-345, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8090337
PERTILE, M.; CECHIN, J.; ZIMMER, V.; AGOSTINETTO, D.; VARGAS, L. Interference of volunteer corn in glyphosate resistant soybean and chemical control in different phenological stages. Bioscience Journal, v.34, n.5, p.1248-1257, 2018. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v34n5a2018-39462
PIASECKI, C.; RIZZARDI, M. A. Herbicidas aplicados em pré-emergência controlam plantas individuais e touceiras de milho voluntário RR® F2 em soja? Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, v.15, n.4, p.332-340, 2016. https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v15i4.497
PIASECKI, C.; RIZZARDI, M. A.; SCHWADE, D. P.; TRES, M.; SARTORI, J. Interference of GR® volunteer corn population and origin on soybean grain yield losses. Planta Daninha, v.36, e018161420, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100003
RITZ, C.; KNISS, A. R.; STREIBIG, J. C. Research methods in weed science: statistics. Weed Science, v.63, n.sp, p.166-187, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-13-00159.1
SAGE, R. F. The evolution of C4 photosynthesis. New Phytologist, v.161, n.2, p.341-370, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.00974.x
SHANER, D. L. Herbicide Handbook. 10. ed. Lawrence: Weed Science Society of America, 2014. 513 p.
SILVA, A. F.; ADEGAS, F. S.; CONCENÇO, G. Characterization of emergence flows of volunteer corn as function of the type of harvest grain loss. Journal of Agricultural Science, v.10, n.5, p.258-267, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v10n5p258
SILVA, A. F.; FERREIRA, E. A.; CONCENÇO, G.; FERREIRA, F. A.; ASPIAZU, I.; GALON, L.; SEDIYAMA, T.; SILVA, A. A. Densidades de plantas daninhas e épocas de controle sobre os componentes de produção da soja. Planta Daninha, v.26, n.1, p.65-71, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582008000100007
TABILE, R. A.; TOLEDO, A.; SILVA, R. P.; FURLANI, C. E. A.; CORTEZ, J. W.; GROTTA, D. C. C. Perdas na colheita de milho em função da rotação do cilindro trilhador e umidade dos grãos. Scientia Agraria, v.9, n.4, p.505-510, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rsa.v9i4.11709
TAKANO, H. K.; MELO, M. S. C.; OVEJERO, R. F. L.; WESTRA, P. H.; GAINES; T. A.; DAYAN, F. E. Trp2027Cys mutation evolves in Digitaria insularis with cross-resistance to ACCase inhibitors. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, v.164, n.1, p.1-6, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.12.011
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Colloquium Agrariae. ISSN: 1809-8215
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.