MULTIVARIATE OF FORAGE BIOMASS, NUTRITIONAL VALUE AND ANIMAL PERFORMANCE IN PASTURES OF Brachiaria brizantha
Keywords:
grow crops, lignin, dissimilarityAbstract
The hypothesis tested was that grasses belonging to the same species, but with variations in forage canopy architecture, would not present oscillations in the variables related to primary production, nutritional value and animal performance under similar edaphoclimatic conditions under the same management system. Thus, the present work intends to evaluate the different cultivars of Brachiaria brizantha observing the dissimilarity of the variables related to forage biomass, nutritive value and animal performance. The experiment was conducted by the Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. The design was completely randomized blocks with three replicates. The treatments were three ecotypes of Brachiaria brizantha, B4, BRS Paiaguás and Xaraés. The grazing method used was the intermittent variable stocking rate. The data of forage canopy height, population density of tillers and index of leaf area were submitted analysis of variance. Estimates of the first and second canonical variables, as well as standardized canonical coefficients were performed. It was noticed oscillations at the height of the foraging canopy between the grasses, in which, pastures of Ecotype B4 present the highest height in relation to the other B. brizantha. BRS Paiaguás presents the highest population density of tillers. The standard canonical coefficients of the first canonical variable showed that net detergent fiber and Lignin are the variables that most affect the first canonical variable, positively and negatively. This indicates that these are the variables that most interfere in the differentiation of characteristics related to the nutritive value of B. brizantha grasses. The first canonical variable explains 80.5% of the B. brizantha pasture variation, in addition, it is possible to observe a differentiated distribution among the pastures studied. The B. brizantha pastures present variations in forage canopy architecture, which end up impacted by the canopy lignin concentration.
Downloads
References
AGNUSDEI, M.G.; MARCO, O.N.; NENNING, F. R.; AELLO, M.S. Leaf blade nutritional quality of rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) as affected by leaf age and length. Crop and Pasture Science, v.62, n.12, p.1098-1105, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP11164
BARBOSA, R.A.; NASCIMENTO JÚNIOR, D.D.; VILELA, H.H., SILVA, S.C.D.; EUCLIDES, V.P.B.; SBRISSIA, A.F.; SOUSA, B.M.D.L. Morphogenic and structural characteristics of guinea grass pastures submitted to three frequencies and two defoliation severities. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.40, n.5, p.947-954, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000500002
BENVENUTTI, M.A.; GORDON, I.J.; POPPI, D.P.; CROWTHER, R.; SPINKS, W.; MORENO, F.C. The horizontal barrier effect of stems on the foraging behaviour of cattle grazing five tropical grasses. Livestock Science, v.126, n.1, p.229-238, 2009. ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.07.006
BENVENUTTI, M.A.; PAVETTI, D.R.; POPPI, D.P.; GORDON, I.J.; CANGIANO, C.A. Defoliation patterns and their implications for the management of vegetative tropical pastures to control intake and diet quality by cattle. Grass and Forage Science, v.71, n.3, p.424-436, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12186
FONSECA, L.; MEZZALIRA, J.C.; BREMM, C.; CARVALHO, P.C.F. Grazing by horizon: what would be the limits to maintain maximum short-term herbage intake rate? Grassland Science in Europe, v.17, p.237–239, 2012.
GASTAL, F.; LEMAIRE, G. Defoliation, shoot plasticity, sward structure and herbage utilization in pasture: Review of the underlying ecophysiological processes. Agriculture, v.5, n.4, p.1146-1171, 2015. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture5041146
REIS, R.A.; BERNARDES, T.F.; SIQUEIRA, G.R. Forragicultura: ciência, tecnologia e gestão dos recursos forrageiros. Jaboticabal: Gráfica Multipress, 2014.
ROMERA, A.J.; BURGES, J.C.; GREGORINI, P.; AGNUSDEI, M.G. Morphological components of Thynopirum ponticum tillers and their contribution to the diet of cattle grazing at contrasting herbage allowances. Livestock Science, v.150, n.1, p.284-292, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.09.013
SILVA, D.J.; QUEIROZ, A.C. Análise de alimentos: métodos químicos e biológicos. 3. ed. Viçosa: UFV, 2002. 235p.
SILVA, S.C; NASCIMENTO JUNIOR, D. Ecofisiologia de plantas forrageiras. In: PEREIRA, O.G.; OBEID, J.A.; NASCIMENTO JUNIOR., D.; FONSECA, D.M., eds. In: SIMPÓSIO SOBRE MANEJO ESTRATÉGICO DA PASTAGEM, 3. Viçosa, 2006. Anais [...]. Viçosa: UFV, 2006. p.1-42.
TAIZ, L.; ZEIGER, E. Fisiologia vegetal. 4. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2009. 848p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Colloquium Agrariae. ISSN: 1809-8215
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.